I was driving down the coast this weekend and caught an episode of On The Media where I heard a very interesting story about William L. Laurence who was a Pulitzer Prize winning journalist in the 40’s that was basically a shill for the government to promote the use of the atomic bomb. It’s really disturbing to know that he wrote for a paper I respect and he even got praised for his work. Here is an excerpt of the transcript which is an interview with David Goodman who co-authored a book called “Exceptions To The Rulers” in which he calls for a posthumous revoking of the Pulitzer Prize to Mr. Laurence.
From On The Media:
Who was William L. Laurence?
Laurence was an immigrant from Eastern Europe. He was a science
reporter for the Times. He won his first Pulitzer Prize in 1937. And he
became a staunch advocate of the atomic bomb long before the atomic
bomb was ever dropped. Throughout the 1930’s he was advocating for
research into the use of atomic power, such that he earned a nickname,
So when the War Department was looking explicitly for a working
newspaperman to help mold public opinion about the bomb, natural
Indeed. General Leslie Groves, who was the military director of the
Manhattan Project, scientists who researched and created the bomb, his
own words were that he was looking for a “suitable newspaperman” to
tell the story of the bomb to the public, to put the language of this
arcane science in laypeople’s terms.
So in March 1945 there was an extraordinary secret meeting held at the
offices of the New York Times, in which General Groves came to meet
with William Laurence and asked that he become a special consultant to
the War Department.
David, there is one brief passage in a piece by Laurence as he flew in
the plane that was about to drop the bomb on Nagasaki, that is an
astonishing window into his frame of mind. Can you read that for me,
What Laurence wrote was that he felt no, quote, “pity or compassion for
the poor devils” who were about to die. And he went further because his
compassion was reserved for the bomb itself. When the bomb detonated,
quote, “Awe-struck, we watched it shoot upward like a meteor coming
from the earth instead of from outer space, becoming ever more alive as
it climbed skyward through the white clouds. It was a living thing, a
new species of being, born right before our incredulous eyes.”
Now the story goes beyond Laurence reporting, with an obvious conflict
of interest, about the dropping of the bomb. It gets far more sordid
because when the news of radiation disease began to leak out, the War
Department went into full defensive mode and used Laurence to publish,
in effect, disinformation. Tell me about that.
General Groves handpicked a group of journalists to accompany him not
to Hiroshima and Nagasaki, but to the bomb site out in New Mexico where
the first bomb was detonated. And it was there that William Laurence
wrote what General Groves had wanted him to write. Laurence, quoting
General Groves, writes, “The Japanese claim that people died from
radiation. If this is true, the number was very small.”
Laurence continues in his own editorializing in the story. He writes,
“The Japanese are still continuing their propaganda, aimed at creating
the impression that we won the war unfairly, and thus attempting to
create sympathy for themselves and milder terms. Thus, at the
beginning, the Japanese described symptoms that did not ring true.”
Sixty years later the dropping of the bomb remains one of the great
historical controversies. What I find so stunning about this is that at
the contemporaneous moment when the world had to make up its mind, the
New York Times, in effect, became a propaganda tool of the U.S.
government. And for this William L. Laurence and the New York Times
were awarded a Pulitzer Prize.
That’s right. And the very debate that you elude to about was the
atomic bomb an appropriate response, well Americans really wouldn’t
know if they don’t know the reality of what happened on the ground. In
our book we call for William Laurence’s Pulitzer Prize to be stripped.